Forum: EasyBoot Topic: Can't boot XP SP3 in multibootable dvd started by: xero_fearstreet Posted by xero_fearstreet on Apr. 01 2011,11:27
This question (as usual) is posed to the 2 mature (not in age, but experience) members, Balder & Madar... ![]() I created a multi-bootable dvd previously which worked fine (XP & Win7). Now, I created a new dvd (XP & Win7 SP1), I went as per the rules & was successful in creating it. But still I'm facing two problems (Win7 SP1 boots properly, no issues with it): 1. Windows XP hangs on the black screen (where it shows "Setup is checking hardware configuration")... 2. But when i remove the SOURCES folder [3.8GB] (which is a part of Win7 SP1 setup), Win XP SP3 installs perfectly... So what is really the problem. Plz help me out... Posted by balder on Apr. 01 2011,12:08
@xero_fearstreetQuote: ”But when i remove the SOURCES folder [3.8GB] (which is a part of Win7 SP1 setup), Win XP SP3 installs perfectly...” This issue is of high interest ![]() ![]() I’m pretty sure you have exceeded the limit for how many files and folders (total size of build) the “system” can place on a DVD in a “safe way”. Even it do looks okay you cannot be sure files and folders are burned on the DVD in a “safe way” when you are that close to the maximum capacity for your DVD. For let’s say 5 years ago, I didn’t dream we should face this kind of problems – but now it seems we already are here ![]() Quote: “I created a multi-bootable dvd previously which worked fine (XP & Win7).” I guess you mean this build < HERE > But now you “expanded” Win7 with a service-pack - which of course increase the size of Win7 - so you are very close to interfere on files in the ”total build” (in this case WinXP-files). I’m not surprised that this kind of problems pops up ![]() Basically, you must find a way to degrease the total size of your build. In case you created ISO with “Optimize” checked – then create ISO without checking “optimize” as it is pointless in this kind of build to use “Optimize”. Note: you can – if present - delete “Setup.exe” and folders like “Docs” and “Support” to degrease the build some Megabytes – however not sure it helps ![]() Not much to “salvation”, but hopefully some clarifying notes to take attention to…. Regards balder Posted by xero_fearstreet on Apr. 01 2011,16:35
I tried to slim down my dvd a bit, but the problem persists friend. ![]() I made it to a dual-layer DVD config but to no help. I'm thinking the problem lies somewhere else (though u may know better than me). ![]() My total DVD size as of now is 4.39 GB (4,719,884,288 bytes) ![]() Do help me out. ![]() Posted by balder on Apr. 01 2011,18:07
@xero_fearstreetQuote: ” Do help me out” Well I’m not sure I can help you fully out but try this: As you only have one WinXP on the root there is no point to hexedit folder i386 and do necessary changes to files involved in hexedit process. I suggest you use the original folder name i386 with its “original” files – NO HEXEDIT ![]() Quote: “My total DVD size as of now is 4.39 GB (4,719,884,288 bytes)” Here below you have important information for the overall types of DVD possible to buy in the open market I cannot see how your size “4,719,884,288 bytes” can fit into any of the “standard” DVD you can buy in your store ![]() Disc Format Gross Capacity (bytes) DVD+R 4,700,372,992 DVD+RW 4.700.372.992 DVD-R 3,950,000,000 DVD-RW 4,700,000,000 DVD-RAM 4,700,307,456 You MUST decrease the size of your build ![]() You claimed that you quote: “I made it to a dual-layer DVD config but to no help.” I’m not sure at all that a ISO created by EasyBoot can be used in this way on a dual-layer DVD ![]() I persist that you must decrease the size of build – it’s the only way. I suggest (if not already done – that you “reduce size of setup-folder i386 using Gosh method – read < HERE > This way language-files and plenty more like “Uppgrade” folders etcetera are wiped out (or manually wipe out folder “Uppgrade” and language packs if you still have these onboard). That might be a solution to your problem. Note: again, use the folder i386 original name as there is no need to hex edit anything – I think you understand my point ![]() Regards balder |